← My Water · Print / save as PDF
CHATFIELD FISH UNIT
Structure dossier · WDID 0801018 · DITCH · SOUTH PLATTE RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:08 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (0576005) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Current administration
● Fully called out — call at CANAL 3 DITCH (CACHE LA POUDRE RIVER, priority 1870-04-01).
● Fully called out — call at BIG T PLATTE R DITCH (BIG THOMPSON RIVER, priority 1865-11-18).
● Fully called out — call at B H EATON DITCH (CACHE LA POUDRE RIVER, priority 1864-06-09).
● Fully called out — call at LAST CHANCE DITCH 2 (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1863-12-30).
● Fully called out — call at NEVADA DITCH (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1865-12-30).
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1972-02-25 — 8088th most senior of the 21881 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 0806197 (1971-07-07). Immediately behind: 0803602 (1979-09-10).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47481.44615 | 1972-02-25 | 1980-12-31 | 18.1 | 1.9 | C | RECFIS |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,933 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2026, came in at 1,853 AF — 96% of that, and 7th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 1,940 | 9th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 366 | 5.0 |
| 2005 | 1,442 | 5th lowest of 15 · 75% of median | 365 | 3.0 |
| 2006 | 1,775 | 6th lowest of 15 · 92% of median | 365 | 3.0 |
| 2007 | 2,860 | 12th lowest of 15 · 148% of median | 344 | 5.0 |
| 2008 | 1,321 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 68% of median | 224 | 3.0 |
| 2009 | 2,107 | 10th lowest of 15 · 109% of median | 240 | 5.0 |
| 2010 | 1,933 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 214 | 5.0 |
| 2019 | 49 | 1st lowest of 15 · 2% of median | 23 | 1.2 |
| 2020 | 1,206 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 62% of median | 209 | 7.3 |
| 2021 | 2,505 | 11th lowest of 15 · 130% of median | 266 | 16.4 |
| 2022 | 1,424 | 4th lowest of 15 · 74% of median | 340 | 13.8 |
| 2023 | 2,866 | 13th lowest of 15 · 148% of median | 273 | 12.0 |
| 2024 | 3,005 | 14th lowest of 15 · 156% of median | 366 | 15.1 |
| 2025 | 3,306 | 15th lowest of 15 · 171% of median | 359 | 9.1 |
| 2026 | 1,853 | 7th lowest of 15 · 96% of median | 218 | 9.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.