Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
SELZELL DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 0801126 · DITCH · DEER CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 22:47 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (0576005) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Current administration
● Fully called out — call at LAST CHANCE DITCH 2 (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1863-12-30).
● Fully called out — call at NEVADA DITCH (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1865-12-30).
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1868-03-01 — 263rd most senior of the 21881 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 2301093 (1867-12-31). Immediately behind: 8000730 (1868-04-15).
Decreed rights (3)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6635.0 | 1868-03-01 | 1883-12-10 | 2.18 | 0.0 | C | IRR | |
| 8188.0 | 1872-06-01 | 1883-12-10 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | |
| 19866.07379 | 1870-03-15 | 1924-06-09 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR |
Legal record & documents
3 decreed actions on record across
2 court cases:
W7198, 12/10/1883.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
W7198 | 2 | 1924-06-09 | O, S |
12/10/1883 | 1 | 1883-12-10 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 57 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 71 AF — 125% of that, and 11th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 10 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 18% of median | 7 | 1.3 |
| 2010 | 43 | 4th lowest of 15 · 75% of median | 63 | 1.5 |
| 2011 | 8 | 1st lowest of 15 · 14% of median | 11 | 0.6 |
| 2012 | 21 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 37% of median | 36 | 1.0 |
| 2013 | 58 | 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median | 45 | 2.0 |
| 2014 | 179 | 15th lowest of 15 · 314% of median | 73 | 2.3 |
| 2015 | 52 | 6th lowest of 15 · 91% of median | 26 | 2.2 |
| 2016 | 81 | 12th lowest of 15 · 142% of median | 32 | 2.5 |
| 2018 | 48 | 5th lowest of 15 · 84% of median | 36 | 1.7 |
| 2019 | 57 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 45 | 1.1 |
| 2020 | 53 | 7th lowest of 15 · 93% of median | 45 | 1.5 |
| 2021 | 133 | 14th lowest of 15 · 233% of median | 48 | 2.7 |
| 2022 | 69 | 10th lowest of 15 · 121% of median | 123 | 2.3 |
| 2023 | 96 | 13th lowest of 15 · 168% of median | 304 | 6.4 |
| 2024 | 71 | 11th lowest of 15 · 125% of median | 53 | 1.7 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use is rising over its last 15 recorded years (+4 AF/yr, Mann-Kendall p=0.013).
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 3 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 3457 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 22% of the irrigation seasons in 1950-2024 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.