← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

0801193

Structure dossier · WDID 0801193 · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:52 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (0576005) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Current administration

● Fully called out — call at LAST CHANCE DITCH 2 (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1863-12-30).

● Fully called out — call at NEVADA DITCH (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1865-12-30).

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1870-06-30323rd most senior of the 21881 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 0801236 (1870-06-01). Immediately behind: 0802905 (1870-06-30).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
7486.01870-06-301883-12-10 2.60.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 312 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1988, came in at 254 AF — 81% of that, and 4th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1974 493 15th lowest of 15 · 158% of median 72 3.5
1975 405 11th lowest of 15 · 130% of median 123 3.0
1976 273 7th lowest of 15 · 88% of median 111 2.0
1977 203 1st lowest of 15 · 65% of median 75 2.0
1978 214 2nd lowest of 15 · 69% of median 82 1.5
1979 464 14th lowest of 15 · 149% of median 142 2.5
1980 400 10th lowest of 15 · 128% of median 176 2.0
1981 444 13th lowest of 15 · 142% of median 168 2.0
1982 312 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 114 2.0
1983 224 3rd lowest of 15 · 72% of median 52 2.5
1984 413 12th lowest of 15 · 132% of median 120 2.5
1985 258 6th lowest of 15 · 83% of median 66 2.0
1986 332 9th lowest of 15 · 106% of median 120 2.0
1987 255 5th lowest of 15 · 82% of median 82 3.0
1988 254 4th lowest of 15 · 81% of median 66 2.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity partial missing name, structure type, water source
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 1892 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity patchy 49% of the irrigation seasons in 1970-1988 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.