← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

GARBER CREEK DITCH 2

Structure dossier · WDID 0801251 · DITCH · GARBER CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:14 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (0576005) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Current administration

● In priority — no active call senior to this structure's rights affects its district (23 active call(s) checked).

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1863-08-30128th most senior of the 21881 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: MANN LAKES RESERVOIR SYSTEM (1863-05-15). Immediately behind: 0801000 (1863-12-30).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
4990.01863-08-301883-12-10 1.060.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 82 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 47 AF — 57% of that, and 6th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1995 359 15th lowest of 15 · 438% of median 183 1.0
1998 254 14th lowest of 15 · 310% of median 130 1.0
1999 182 13th lowest of 15 · 222% of median 93 1.0
2000 17 2nd lowest of 15 · 21% of median 37 0.4
2005 161 11th lowest of 15 · 196% of median 110 2.0
2007 46 5th lowest of 15 · 56% of median 135 0.5
2008 35 4th lowest of 15 · 43% of median 65 0.4
2009 34 3rd lowest of 15 · 42% of median 94 0.4
2010 82 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 31 1.9
2015 146 10th lowest of 15 · 178% of median 63 2.0
2016 169 12th lowest of 15 · 206% of median 47 2.6
2021 50 7th lowest of 15 · 61% of median 51 1.1
2022 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 61 0.0
2023 95 9th lowest of 15 · 116% of median 304 3.7
2024 47 6th lowest of 15 · 57% of median 79 0.9

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.