Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
0801363
Structure dossier · WDID 0801363 · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 22:27 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (0576005) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Current administration
● Fully called out — call at LAST CHANCE DITCH 2 (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1863-12-30).
● Fully called out — call at NEVADA DITCH (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1865-12-30).
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1877-12-18 — 535th most senior of the 21881 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 2302916 (1877-07-01). Immediately behind: 0805169 (1877-12-18).
Decreed rights (2)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10214.0 | 1877-12-18 | 1883-12-10 | 12.4 | 0.0 | A | IRRCOMINDFIRDOM | |
| 10214.0 | 1877-12-18 | 1883-12-10 | 0.85 | 0.0 | C | IRRCOMINDFIRDOM |
Legal record & documents
9 decreed actions on record across
4 court cases:
95CW0039, 88CW0097, 87CW0326, 12/10/1883.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
95CW0039 | 2 | 1883-12-10 | O |
88CW0097 | 3 | 1883-12-10 | O |
87CW0326 | 3 | 1883-12-10 | O |
12/10/1883 | 1 | 1883-12-10 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 218 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1985, came in at 63 AF — 29% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 422 | 14th lowest of 15 · 194% of median | 154 | 3.0 |
| 1971 | 272 | 11th lowest of 15 · 125% of median | 92 | 5.0 |
| 1972 | 169 | 5th lowest of 15 · 78% of median | 87 | 1.0 |
| 1973 | 286 | 12th lowest of 15 · 131% of median | 93 | 3.0 |
| 1974 | 744 | 15th lowest of 15 · 341% of median | 114 | 4.0 |
| 1975 | 287 | 13th lowest of 15 · 132% of median | 51 | 3.5 |
| 1976 | 270 | 10th lowest of 15 · 124% of median | 74 | 2.0 |
| 1977 | 169 | 5th lowest of 15 · 78% of median | 74 | 2.0 |
| 1978 | 149 | 4th lowest of 15 · 68% of median | 34 | 2.5 |
| 1979 | 251 | 9th lowest of 15 · 115% of median | 84 | 2.0 |
| 1980 | 94 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 43% of median | 30 | 2.0 |
| 1981 | 218 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 69 | 2.5 |
| 1982 | 190 | 7th lowest of 15 · 87% of median | 83 | 2.0 |
| 1983 | 110 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 50% of median | 34 | 2.0 |
| 1985 | 63 | 1st lowest of 15 · 29% of median | 17 | 2.0 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use is falling over its last 15 recorded years (-18 AF/yr, Mann-Kendall p=0.003).
How good is our record of it?
Grade C (6/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | partial | missing name, structure type, water source |
| decreed rights | on file | 2 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 1090 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 33% of the irrigation seasons in 1970-1985 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.