← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

DIXON FEEDLOT W 2-26689F

Structure dossier · WDID 0805004 · WELL · GROUNDWATER: SOUTH PLATTE RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:34 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (0576005) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Current administration

● Junior rights called out — call at LITTLETON BOAT CHUTE NO 10 (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1994-12-02).

● Fully called out — call at LAST CHANCE DITCH 2 (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1863-12-30).

● Fully called out — call at NEVADA DITCH (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1865-12-30).

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1952-06-303319th most senior of the 21881 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 0208286 (1952-06-30). Immediately behind: 0205569 (1952-07-01).

Decreed rights (3)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
37436.01952-06-301972-12-31 41.50.0 AIRRMUNCOMINDRECFIRDOMOTH
52960.524241993-07-131995-12-31 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMSTKAUG
57708.524241993-07-132008-12-31 0.00.0 CMUN

Recorded use (last 6 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 2,582 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1975, came in at 2,698 AF — 104% of that, and 4th lowest of the 6 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1970 3,017 5th lowest of 6 · 117% of median 123 13.0
1971 2,467 3rd lowest of 6 · 96% of median 154 14.0
1972 2,408 2nd lowest of 6 · 93% of median 153 14.0
1973 1,528 1st lowest of 6 · 59% of median 78 13.9
1974 3,416 6th lowest of 6 · 132% of median 124 14.0
1975 2,698 4th lowest of 6 · 104% of median 162 8.5

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 3 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 794 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity patchy 68% of the irrigation seasons in 1970-1975 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.