← My Water · Print / save as PDF
0805060
Structure dossier · WDID 0805060 · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-28 05:22 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (0576005) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Current administration
● Fully called out — call at LAST CHANCE DITCH 2 (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1863-12-30).
● Fully called out — call at NEVADA DITCH (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1865-12-30).
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1946-11-07 — 2758th most senior of the 21881 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 0207785 (1946-10-31). Immediately behind: 0810054 (1946-11-07).
Decreed rights (2)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35374.0 | 1946-11-07 | 1972-05-18 | 2.08 | 0.0 | C | IRRFIRDOM | |
| 51023.0 | 1989-09-11 | 1989-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMSTKAUG |
Legal record & documents
4 decreed actions on record across
2 court cases:
89CW0136, CA3635.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
89CW0136 | 3 | 1989-12-31 | S |
CA3635 | 1 | 1972-05-18 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 12 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 272 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1984, came in at 44 AF — 16% of that, and 1st lowest of the 12 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1973 | 460 | 11th lowest of 12 · 169% of median | 117 | 2.0 |
| 1974 | 659 | 12th lowest of 12 · 242% of median | 169 | 2.0 |
| 1975 | 301 | 8th lowest of 12 · 111% of median | 81 | 2.0 |
| 1976 | 317 | 9th lowest of 12 · 116% of median | 161 | 1.0 |
| 1977 | 294 | 7th lowest of 12 · 108% of median | 77 | 2.0 |
| 1978 | 333 | 10th lowest of 12 · 122% of median | 90 | 2.0 |
| 1979 | 179 | 4th lowest of 12 · 66% of median | 47 | 2.0 |
| 1980 | 250 | 6th lowest of 12 · 92% of median | 69 | 2.0 |
| 1981 | 210 | 5th lowest of 12 · 77% of median | 56 | 2.0 |
| 1982 | 135 | 3rd lowest of 12 · 50% of median | 35 | 2.0 |
| 1983 | 127 | 2nd lowest of 12 · 47% of median | 34 | 2.0 |
| 1984 | 44 | 1st lowest of 12 · 16% of median | 12 | 2.0 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use is falling over its last 12 recorded years (-36 AF/yr, Mann-Kendall p=0.000).
How good is our record of it?
Grade C (6/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | partial | missing name, structure type, water source |
| decreed rights | on file | 2 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 948 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 39% of the irrigation seasons in 1973-1984 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.