← My Water · Print / save as PDF
LAUGHLIN DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 1000592 · 1 · FOUNTAIN CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:21 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1862-12-31 — 38th most senior of the 2864 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: OWEN & HALL DITCH (1862-12-31). Immediately behind: BURKE DITCH (1862-12-31).
Decreed rights (2)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4748.0 | 1862-12-31 | 1882-03-06 | 9.36 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNRECDOMAUG | 10 |
| 5113.0 | 1863-12-31 | 1882-03-06 | 2.17 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNRECDOMAUG | 17 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 836 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1985, came in at 66 AF — 8% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1971 | 889 | 10th lowest of 15 · 106% of median | 304 | 11.6 |
| 1972 | 836 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 51 | 11.5 |
| 1973 | 820 | 7th lowest of 15 · 98% of median | 66 | 11.5 |
| 1974 | 2,029 | 14th lowest of 15 · 243% of median | 209 | 10.9 |
| 1975 | 2,414 | 15th lowest of 15 · 289% of median | 222 | 11.5 |
| 1976 | 814 | 6th lowest of 15 · 97% of median | 86 | 11.1 |
| 1977 | 1,112 | 11th lowest of 15 · 133% of median | 226 | 4.8 |
| 1978 | 855 | 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median | 244 | 4.1 |
| 1979 | 1,396 | 13th lowest of 15 · 167% of median | 307 | 4.7 |
| 1980 | 1,175 | 12th lowest of 15 · 141% of median | 300 | 5.7 |
| 1981 | 64 | 1st lowest of 15 · 8% of median | 39 | 2.0 |
| 1982 | 430 | 4th lowest of 15 · 51% of median | 59 | 3.8 |
| 1983 | 528 | 5th lowest of 15 · 63% of median | 77 | 3.8 |
| 1984 | 219 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 26% of median | 56 | 3.8 |
| 1985 | 66 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 8% of median | 60 | 1.2 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.