Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
33RD ST PUMP STATION
Structure dossier · WDID 1000883 · 8 · BEAR CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 22:08 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1861-03-20 — 9th most senior of the 2864 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: MANITOU IRON SPRINGS P/L (1861-03-20). Immediately behind: MEMORIAL PARK DIVERSION (1861-03-20).
Decreed rights (7)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4097.0 | 1861-03-20 | 1882-03-06 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | 2 |
| 4098.0 | 1861-03-21 | 1882-03-06 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | 3 |
| 5113.0 | 1863-12-31 | 1882-03-06 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | 12 |
| 5194.0 | 1864-03-21 | 1882-03-06 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | 19 |
| 7934.0 | 1871-09-21 | 1882-03-06 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | 32 |
| 11443.0 | 1881-04-30 | 1882-03-06 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | 46 |
| 48942.45775 | 1975-04-30 | 1984-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | ALL |
Legal record & documents
12 decreed actions on record across
7 court cases:
16CW3056, 04CW0132, 86CW0118B, 86CW0118A, 84CW0202B, 84CW0202A, 90CW0029.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
16CW3056 | 1 | 2016-12-31 | S |
04CW0132 | 1 | 2004-12-31 | S |
86CW0118B | 1 | 1986-12-31 | S |
86CW0118A | 1 | 1986-12-31 | S |
84CW0202B | 1 | 1984-12-31 | S |
84CW0202A | 1 | 1984-12-31 | S |
90CW0029 | 6 | 1882-03-06 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 703 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 1,413 AF — 201% of that, and 13th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 1,068 | 11th lowest of 15 · 152% of median | 335 | 6.5 |
| 2012 | 853 | 10th lowest of 15 · 121% of median | 366 | 3.9 |
| 2013 | 1,205 | 12th lowest of 15 · 171% of median | 303 | 7.3 |
| 2014 | 404 | 5th lowest of 15 · 58% of median | 215 | 6.1 |
| 2015 | 703 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 181 | 5.9 |
| 2016 | 495 | 7th lowest of 15 · 70% of median | 213 | 3.7 |
| 2017 | 427 | 6th lowest of 15 · 61% of median | 303 | 3.6 |
| 2018 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 364 | 0.0 |
| 2019 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 243 | 0.0 |
| 2020 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 91 | 0.0 |
| 2021 | 10 | 4th lowest of 15 · 1% of median | 365 | 3.1 |
| 2022 | 792 | 9th lowest of 15 · 113% of median | 365 | 7.0 |
| 2023 | 2,021 | 14th lowest of 15 · 288% of median | 365 | 11.5 |
| 2024 | 3,141 | 15th lowest of 15 · 447% of median | 366 | 12.4 |
| 2025 | 1,413 | 13th lowest of 15 · 201% of median | 304 | 7.7 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 15 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 7 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 10261 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | continuous | 100% of the irrigation seasons in 1992-2025 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.