← My Water · Print / save as PDF
BEAR CREEK PIPELINE
Structure dossier · WDID 1000535 · 7 · BEAR CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:36 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1861-12-31 — 17th most senior of the 2864 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: FOUNTAIN MUTUAL CANAL (1861-09-21). Immediately behind: STUBBS & MILLER DITCH (1861-12-31).
Decreed rights (9)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4383.0 | 1861-12-31 | 1882-03-06 | 5.34 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 4828.0 | 1863-03-21 | 1882-03-06 | 5.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 6108.0 | 1866-09-21 | 1882-03-06 | 6.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 9211.0 | 1875-03-21 | 1882-03-06 | 8.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 14350.0 | 1889-04-15 | 1954-02-08 | 9.4 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 20892.0 | 1907-03-15 | 1954-02-08 | 4.2 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 48942.45775 | 1975-04-30 | 1984-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | ALL | |
| 49387.0 | 1985-03-20 | 1985-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | ALL | |
| 56596.0 | 2004-12-14 | 2004-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | ALL |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 719 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2001, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1985 | 2,639 | 15th lowest of 15 · 367% of median | 355 | 9.5 |
| 1986 | 1,095 | 11th lowest of 15 · 152% of median | 365 | 2.4 |
| 1987 | 1,665 | 13th lowest of 15 · 232% of median | 360 | 5.9 |
| 1988 | 1,053 | 10th lowest of 15 · 146% of median | 361 | 2.5 |
| 1989 | 1,300 | 12th lowest of 15 · 181% of median | 358 | 10.6 |
| 1990 | 2,492 | 14th lowest of 15 · 347% of median | 360 | 18.2 |
| 1991 | 447 | 7th lowest of 15 · 62% of median | 340 | 1.5 |
| 1992 | 719 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 354 | 3.7 |
| 1993 | 850 | 9th lowest of 15 · 118% of median | 279 | 2.8 |
| 1994 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 4 | 0.0 |
| 1995 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 22 | 0.0 |
| 1998 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 2 | 0.0 |
| 1999 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 18 | 0.0 |
| 2000 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 24 | 0.0 |
| 2001 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 20 | 0.0 |
Call-derived yield: senior right divertible 96.7% of a median season / 40.2% dry-year.
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.