Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

CLEAR SPRINGS RANCH P-13

Structure dossier · WDID 1005640 · 2 · FOUNTAIN CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 23:25 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1964-05-29 — 856th most senior of the 2864 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: JANITELL WELL NO 107 (1964-05-29). Immediately behind: JANITELL WELL NO 106 (1964-06-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
41787.01964-05-291971-12-31 2.670.0 CIRRMUNDOM

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 77 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2013, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1999 26 2nd lowest of 15 · 34% of median 35 2.3
2000 153 15th lowest of 15 · 199% of median 170 1.5
2001 80 10th lowest of 15 · 104% of median 117 3.1
2002 77 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 201 1.7
2003 86 13th lowest of 15 · 112% of median 124 2.0
2004 85 12th lowest of 15 · 110% of median 191 2.2
2005 36 3rd lowest of 15 · 47% of median 125 1.0
2006 66 5th lowest of 15 · 86% of median 146 1.1
2007 71 7th lowest of 15 · 92% of median 234 0.9
2008 78 9th lowest of 15 · 101% of median 344 0.7
2009 81 11th lowest of 15 · 105% of median 267 0.7
2010 66 5th lowest of 15 · 86% of median 290 0.6
2011 52 4th lowest of 15 · 68% of median 365 0.6
2012 94 14th lowest of 15 · 122% of median 337 0.7
2013 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 10 0.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 3643 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 86% of the irrigation seasons in 1993-2013 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.