Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
JUST NO 2 DITCH (POLE CREEK)
Structure dossier · WDID 5100752 · 1 · POLE CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:12 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1892-06-01 — 114th most senior of the 2208 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HAMMOND DITCH (1891-12-31). Immediately behind: JUST NO 3 DITCH (1892-06-01).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15493.0 | 1892-06-01 | 1906-08-11 | 1.2 | 0.0 | C | IRRAUG | 97 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 182 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1991, came in at 175 AF — 96% of that, and 7th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1977 | 140 | 5th lowest of 15 · 77% of median | 89 | 1.0 |
| 1978 | 261 | 14th lowest of 15 · 143% of median | 74 | 1.8 |
| 1979 | 330 | 15th lowest of 15 · 181% of median | 99 | 1.7 |
| 1980 | 227 | 10th lowest of 15 · 125% of median | 89 | 1.3 |
| 1981 | 94 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 52% of median | 77 | 1.2 |
| 1982 | 149 | 6th lowest of 15 · 82% of median | 76 | 1.0 |
| 1983 | 182 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 93 | 1.0 |
| 1984 | 87 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 48% of median | 45 | 1.0 |
| 1985 | 234 | 11th lowest of 15 · 129% of median | 69 | 2.0 |
| 1986 | 240 | 13th lowest of 15 · 132% of median | 81 | 2.0 |
| 1987 | 203 | 9th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | 86 | 2.0 |
| 1988 | 131 | 4th lowest of 15 · 72% of median | 86 | 1.0 |
| 1989 | 38 | 1st lowest of 15 · 21% of median | 38 | 1.0 |
| 1990 | 238 | 12th lowest of 15 · 131% of median | 41 | 3.0 |
| 1991 | 175 | 7th lowest of 15 · 96% of median | 47 | 3.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.