← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

JUST NO 3 DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5100754 · 1 · POLE CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:18 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1892-06-01115th most senior of the 2208 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: JUST NO 2 DITCH (POLE CREEK) (1892-06-01). Immediately behind: WESTMAN NO 2 DITCH (1893-05-31).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
15493.01892-06-011906-08-11 1.00.0 CIRRAUG 97
50022.01986-12-151987-12-31 0.00.0 AAUG

Recorded use (last 11 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 111 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1989, came in at 36 AF — 32% of that, and 1st lowest of the 11 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1975 123 8th lowest of 11 · 111% of median 63 1.0
1976 75 3rd lowest of 11 · 68% of median 58 1.0
1978 236 10th lowest of 11 · 213% of median 74 1.8
1979 292 11th lowest of 11 · 263% of median 99 1.5
1980 227 9th lowest of 11 · 204% of median 89 1.3
1981 111 6th lowest of 11 · 100% of median 77 1.1
1982 119 7th lowest of 11 · 107% of median 76 0.8
1984 87 4th lowest of 11 · 78% of median 45 1.0
1986 110 5th lowest of 11 · 99% of median 81 1.0
1988 65 2nd lowest of 11 · 59% of median 23 1.5
1989 36 1st lowest of 11 · 32% of median 24 1.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.