Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
WINTER PARK WEST WELL 6
Structure dossier · WDID 5105222 · 2 · FRASER RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 23:56 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1882-12-31 — 16th most senior of the 2208 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WINTER PARK WEST WELL 5 (1882-12-31). Immediately behind: WINTER PARK WEST WELL 3 (1882-12-31).
Decreed rights (5)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12053.0 | 1882-12-31 | 1906-08-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | 12 |
| 12296.0 | 1883-08-31 | 1906-08-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | 19 |
| 20676.14944 | 1890-11-30 | 1911-08-03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | 192 |
| 34241.15493 | 1892-06-01 | 1952-11-07 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | 448 |
| 42562.0 | 1966-07-13 | 1972-12-31 | 0.28 | 0.0 | C | MUNCOMINDRECFISDOMWLD |
Legal record & documents
8 decreed actions on record across
5 court cases:
W0995, 94CW0160, 86CW0240, 86CW0016, W2264.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
W0995 | 1 | 1972-12-31 | O |
94CW0160 | 1 | 1972-12-31 | S |
86CW0240 | 1 | 1972-12-31 | O |
86CW0016 | 1 | 1972-12-31 | O |
W2264 | 4 | 1952-11-07 | O, S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 8 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 40 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 40 AF — 101% of that, and 5th lowest of the 8 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 20 | 1st lowest of 8 · 51% of median | 214 | 0.7 |
| 2018 | 39 | 4th lowest of 8 · 99% of median | 365 | 0.4 |
| 2019 | 58 | 7th lowest of 8 · 147% of median | 303 | 0.8 |
| 2020 | 124 | 8th lowest of 8 · 314% of median | 304 | 0.6 |
| 2021 | 43 | 6th lowest of 8 · 109% of median | 365 | 0.2 |
| 2022 | 32 | 2nd lowest of 8 · 81% of median | 365 | 0.2 |
| 2023 | 36 | 3rd lowest of 8 · 91% of median | 365 | 0.2 |
| 2024 | 40 | 5th lowest of 8 · 101% of median | 305 | 0.2 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 8 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 5 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 2586 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | continuous | 100% of the irrigation seasons in 2017-2024 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.