← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

WINTER PARK WEST WELL 2

Structure dossier · WDID 5105225 · 2 · FRASER RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 01:50 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1882-12-3119th most senior of the 2208 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WINTER PARK WEST WELL 1 (1882-12-31). Immediately behind: WINTER PARK WEST WELL 4 (1882-12-31).

Decreed rights (5)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
12053.01882-12-311906-08-11 0.00.0 CMUN 12
12296.01883-08-311906-08-11 0.00.0 CMUN 19
20676.149441890-11-301911-08-03 0.00.0 CMUN 192
34241.154931892-06-011952-11-07 0.00.0 CMUN 448
42562.01966-07-131972-12-31 0.450.0 CMUNCOMINDRECFISDOMWLD

Recorded use (last 8 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 28 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 8 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2017 6 2nd lowest of 8 · 21% of median 61 0.2
2018 31 6th lowest of 8 · 111% of median 334 0.3
2019 27 4th lowest of 8 · 96% of median 184 0.4
2020 194 8th lowest of 8 · 693% of median 335 1.3
2021 23 3rd lowest of 8 · 82% of median 365 0.2
2022 29 5th lowest of 8 · 104% of median 365 0.3
2023 35 7th lowest of 8 · 125% of median 365 0.3
2024 0 1st lowest of 8 · 0% of median 305 0.1

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 5 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 2314 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 100% of the irrigation seasons in 2017-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.