← My Water · Print / save as PDF
MOUNTAIN SUPPLY RES 20
Structure dossier · WDID 0303678 · 3 · JOE WRIGHT CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:17 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1904-09-20 — 250th most senior of the 2961 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BELLAIRES LAKE RES (1904-07-29). Immediately behind: ZIMMERMAN LAKE RES (1904-10-04).
Decreed rights (4)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20066.19986 | 1904-09-20 | 1922-04-22 | 797.0 | 0.0 | A | IRR | |
| 35050.26297 | 1921-12-31 | 1953-09-10 | 797.14 | 0.0 | A | IRRMUNINDDOM | |
| 44243.0 | 1971-02-18 | 1971-12-31 | 6363.64 | 0.0 | A | IRRMUNCOMINDDOM | |
| 59161.0 | 2011-12-23 | 2011-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 7,276 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 7,636 AF — 105% of that, and 11th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 5,988 | 6th lowest of 15 · 82% of median | 5,718 | 365 | 150.3 |
| 2011 | 4,090 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 56% of median | 4,732 | 317 | 81.7 |
| 2012 | 4,720 | 4th lowest of 15 · 65% of median | 3,502 | 355 | 53.8 |
| 2013 | 13,657 | 15th lowest of 15 · 188% of median | 4,317 | 365 | 258.7 |
| 2014 | 8,882 | 13th lowest of 15 · 122% of median | 5,580 | 355 | 145.1 |
| 2015 | 4,405 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 60% of median | 2,963 | 365 | 158.0 |
| 2016 | 4,068 | 1st lowest of 15 · 56% of median | 368 | 366 | 100.7 |
| 2017 | 8,905 | 14th lowest of 15 · 122% of median | 3,848 | 365 | 91.0 |
| 2018 | 7,191 | 7th lowest of 15 · 99% of median | 5,114 | 365 | 183.8 |
| 2019 | 7,499 | 10th lowest of 15 · 103% of median | 6,993 | 365 | 99.5 |
| 2020 | 5,974 | 5th lowest of 15 · 82% of median | 4,782 | 366 | 105.1 |
| 2021 | 7,461 | 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median | 3,458 | 364 | 176.8 |
| 2022 | 7,276 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 3,805 | 365 | 111.7 |
| 2023 | 8,331 | 12th lowest of 15 · 114% of median | 4,865 | 365 | 90.3 |
| 2024 | 7,636 | 11th lowest of 15 · 105% of median | 3,798 | 305 | 132.9 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.