← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

ENGLEWOOD INTAKE

Structure dossier · WDID 0801013 · PIPELINE · SOUTH PLATTE RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:57 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (0576005) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Current administration

● Junior rights called out — call at LOWER LATHAM DITCH (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1877-11-14).

● Junior rights called out — call at WESTERN MUTUAL DITCH (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1871-08-09).

● Junior rights called out — call at HARMONY DITCH 1 (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1897-05-02).

● Junior rights called out — call at SOUTH PLATTE RIVER COMPACT (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1897-06-13).

● Junior rights called out — call at LOWER PLATTE BEAVER D (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1888-04-14).

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1861-08-3042nd most senior of the 21881 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 0801009 (1861-08-30). Immediately behind: 0801462 (1861-08-30).

Decreed rights (9)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
4260.01861-08-301883-12-10 11.0060.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMSTKOTH
4352.01861-11-301883-12-10 7.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDFIRDOMOTH
4717.01862-11-301883-12-10 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDRECDOMAUGPWR
5112.01863-12-301883-12-10 1.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDFIRDOMOTH
5843.01865-12-301883-12-10 6.7160.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDFIRDOMOTHWLD
7669.01870-12-301883-12-10 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDDOM
46020.417141964-03-171976-12-31 0.00.0 CMUN
51134.508481989-03-201990-12-31 0.00.0 CMUNALL
51485.01990-12-171990-12-31 5.9532.05 CIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMSTKAUG

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 6,312 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2010, came in at 5,205 AF — 82% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1996 6,800 12th lowest of 15 · 108% of median 366 24.4
1997 6,131 7th lowest of 15 · 97% of median 358 22.5
1998 7,773 13th lowest of 15 · 123% of median 365 24.3
1999 6,520 10th lowest of 15 · 103% of median 314 32.6
2000 9,441 15th lowest of 15 · 150% of median 366 28.7
2001 7,925 14th lowest of 15 · 126% of median 364 28.4
2002 4,747 2nd lowest of 15 · 75% of median 331 25.1
2003 6,483 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median 362 22.1
2004 6,312 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 364 46.7
2005 5,947 5th lowest of 15 · 94% of median 365 22.4
2006 6,767 11th lowest of 15 · 107% of median 352 21.5
2007 6,027 6th lowest of 15 · 96% of median 365 28.0
2008 5,833 4th lowest of 15 · 92% of median 360 21.6
2009 4,696 1st lowest of 15 · 74% of median 349 18.1
2010 5,205 3rd lowest of 15 · 82% of median 299 20.6

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 9 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 21486 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 100% of the irrigation seasons in 1950-2026 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.